When your case outgrows a one-off implementation, we take on the full build as a partner — analysis, construction, integration and operations, accountable for the delivered outcome.
Let’s talk about your caseWe take responsibility for the finished product: analysis, construction, integration and operations. The same team that starts is the one that delivers and operates it. We work in your repository, your Slack and your board, and we are productive from week one.
We use AI on concrete parts of the cycle — code generation, code review, testing and documentation — to ship faster with fewer defects. What you receive is clean, working code.
Two-week sprints with a demo and feedback at the end of each. You see working progress every two weeks. If something is off, we adjust direction in the next planning round at no extra cost.
A shared Slack channel, optional dailies and a fixed weekly with decision-makers. You talk directly to the developers writing the code. When there is a trade-off, you make the call with clear information, there and then.
Clean code, automated tests and CI/CD from day one. The product grows without a rewrite as usage climbs or features pile up.
Maintenance, evolution and post-launch support available monthly as needed. If you prefer to bring it in-house later, we hand over full documentation and onboarding for your team.
A one-off implementation resolves most of the cases we see: a contained integration, a clear scope, a few weeks of work. But some projects do not fit that format. If your case needs continuous development over months, several simultaneous integrations with legacy systems, or new functionality built on a product already in production, we take on the full build as a partner rather than splitting the work into successive implementations.
It also applies when a roadmap needs to be sustained over months: evolving a product already in production, executing a large migration, or building new functionality start to finish. In these cases we take responsibility for the whole outcome instead of a one-off service: there's continuity of context, accumulated product knowledge and commitment to the entire roadmap, not to loose hours.
What we keep from our implementations: agile process, frequent deliveries and per-phase proposals with fixed scope. The difference is the commitment duration (typically 2+ months) and the depth of the work. The per-phase scope is still fixed so you know exactly what you're committing to.
When it doesn't apply: if your case is a one-off automation of a few weeks, a custom implementation is simpler and sufficient. If you need a small CRM integration or an isolated dashboard, you don't need this format. Simple rule: if the scope closes in a few weeks, it's a one-off implementation; if it requires development sustained over time, it's Custom Development.
Scope spanning several months
Your project requires sustained development instead of a one-off implementation.
Multiple complex integrations
Heterogeneous legacy systems, large migrations or building on top of products already in production.
A roadmap sustained over time
Your product needs continuous evolution over months and you want a partner who owns the outcome.
One-off automation
If it can be closed in a few weeks, a custom implementation is simpler, cheaper and sufficient.
A small integration
An isolated CRM connector or a dashboard doesn't require a multi-month commitment.
Case not yet defined
If there's no clarity on what to build, we start with discovery and a proposal before assembling a team.
We choose the right tools for each project.
Or email us at hello@berit.ar